Multiple Chemical Sensitivity Etiology
Airway Genetics and Ambient Combustion Aerosol
Link to terrain map, and a summary of nutrition and exercise
Hi Jamala,
Out of the following, the only solution, if any; is the 36 acres for 38,000 at elevation 4850 feet. Also linked below are other examples, some land only, and 2 with 5th wheelers and septic.
I am open to all ideas you have or prefer for a residential solution, if you decide we are allowed to have a relationship. I have very briefly exchanged with several people since you cut me loose, each time appreciating the value we have when God and love, caring, kindness, and truth are priority of our thinking.
It is important that I respect your instruction to not send E-mails. I thought I should respond to your recent view with a more thorough update. I'm at, or near, Cedar City for at least 2 more days. I'm scheduled in to repair and increase the number of rear leaf springs on the truck. I would like to settle to a minimum of driving on safe, straight, smooth roads that lead to a pretty, peaceful, clean destination where we can take pleasant walks. That 36 acre property might work; but if there is a better idea I'm for that.
The financial future may be less bright iwhen all the money keeps going to the landlord. If gradually we build the comfort level on the larger acre rural parcel, upon completion we have increased value of the property, and then all the money that still would be going to rent would be available for savings.
When you do the math for example: if we bought a house in a low cost town up north for 80,000, then with annual savings of 12,000 and 6% mutual fund in ten years at least 160,000. We could apply the same principle on the parcel, or any other alternative that you might think of. I'm pretty sure we each don't want a cold climate.
The following is google map topographical "terrain" southeast of Hackberry, Arizona; though I suppose you could "travel" anywhere on the map.
https://www.trulia.com/p/az/kingman/15750-e-dicks-camp-rd-kingman-az-86411--2114849512
https://www.google.com/maps/@35.2637747,-113.7100932,14z/data=!5m1!...
The following 2 properties are above 4400 which is good, but out in the middle of present or potential neighbors which could result in propane, gasoline generator, wood smoke, or burn barrel pollution. Also, these lots are smaller at less than 10 acres:
https://www.realtor.com/realestateandhomes-search/Hackberry_AZ/pric...
The following lot has a desirable height of 4850 on 36 acres backed up on mountainous public land, in fact a rock outcropping is on the property, however there may be an occupied strip of private property before the public land. The route from town is about 26 miles excellent straight paved RT 66, then flat wide graveled or natural sand maintained Hackberry Road for about 5-6 miles, then Dick's Camp Road is gravel maintained for about 3-4 miles, then the last 5-6 miles are natural surface, apparently graded but so far I don't know by who. It will require finding out what it is like by driving it.
Scrolling down the page, below the following map, is a description of the people who live in Hackberry:
https://www.neighborhoodscout.com/az/hackberry
The following property is located about 8 miles west of the above 4850 elevation on 36 acres property. This one has a large 5th wheeler house, septic, and well water. All it needs is solar for electricity. Although backed up by 640 acres public land due to 1 square mile public checkerboard ownership, it doesn't provide enough protection from combustion practices on ranchettes in the alternate squares.
I think the following is pretty and cute. It includes a 5th wheeler, storage shed, and septic tank, but still needs water and solar. The burn barrel is grim reminder of pollution the neighbors can generate. The property is well below the desired minimum height of 4400 feet, and there is an area of low lying washes on the road out.
From a health standpoint, nutrition is in a way, very simple:
There are some 200 fruits and vegetables, just avoid olives, avocados, and soybeans; they are too oily. For the most part the rest are good.
Nuts and seeds are also too oily.
Whole grains are good, with some plus and minus: whole wheat has high bulk (fiber and digestion resistant starch) per calorie and some people intolerant of the gliadin fraction within the gluten (gluten intolerant), oats can be too oily consumed in high quantity, oat fiber is a viscous fiber type which produces a loose low bulk stool, rather than the desirable spongy stool provided by the hydrating fiber of brown rice. Oats also present an intolerance to some people, similar to the gluten intolerance of whole wheat.
Brown rice has the peculiarity of bringing more inorganic arsenic (iA) from the soil into the grain, resulting in 10X more iA than other grains. While you would think this would make brown rice an unhealthy choice, Thailand has some of the world's highest rice consumption and the lowest dietary fat consumption, resulting in a reported 25X lower rate of intestinal, prostate, and breast cancer.
Except for the more expensive basmati brown rice, which may have 30% less iA , US rice, especially from the south central states, has higher iA than Thai rice, but the difference may not be that great: 154 ppb US brown rice, two samples of Thai jasmine came in at 112 and 150. It may help to pre-rinse before cooking, may remove 30%; a 5 minute boil, discard water, then cook as usual has been shown to remove 54%; on top of that at least about 30% of iA is bound in the bran portion and passes unabsorbed in the feces. The initial 154 ppb per dry raw brown rice, seems daunting compared to the maximum iA level set for drinking water at 10ppb. Two parts water for the rice dilutes to 50ppb, then 30% removed in pre-rinse lowers to 35ppb, then another 30% bound up in undigestible bran fiber excreted, then closer to 20ppb, then the dilution of all other water consumed.
First the vegetables and whole grain; now the fruit: juicy fruits tend to wash out like a laxative. Bananas may be the most substantial; as I recall 50% of banana calories are digestion resistant starch, 25% fructose, and 25% glucose; this contrasts with the 75% of calories fructose content of apples. Oranges and grapes come down in the middle at 50% fructose calories. Fruit is conceivably of atherogenic potency, similar to white table sugar, due to fructose content; especially the juices; but fruit comes with the advantage of some nutrients, especially potassium; however, lacking in protein and most essential nutrients.
So nutrition is simple: the good stuff without the oily villains: olives, avocados, soybeans, nuts, and seeds; and and with the inclusion of a limited amount of "meat factor", the medical doctor or naturopathic is going to lose a lot of business.
The "meat factor", a requirement that can be met with fish, provides B12, muscle carnitine transport capacity, iron absorption enhancement, and an additional source of protein. The optimal quantity is 4-6 ounces per day depending on individual body size. More than 4-6 results in too much cholesterol; even the leanest choices have similar amounts of cholesterol; however meat, in contrast to fish, may present high levels of saturated fat if consumed in excess.
In order to get 2000 or more calories as a carnivore exceeding the 4-6 ounce limit, the following is likely to happen:
1) immediate and ongoing impaired fine capillary circulation due to sludging of blood components by lipid carrying chylomicrons.
2) plaque growing, artery narrowing, atherogenic conditions due to higher levels of circulating lipids and cholesterol; these along with calcium, are the principal components of hardened plaque.
3) a much higher risk for intestinal, prostate and breast cancer due to high levels of dietary fat because:
a) impaired capillaries reduce oxygen and nutrient flow within tissue and hamper removal of waste and toxins,
b) high fat intake of carnivore alters hormone expression in a carcinogenic direction,
c) early menarche associated with increased breast cancer risk occurs due to hormone expression among those on high fat western diets,
d) the fatty acid composition of adipose tissue reflects the fatty acid composition of the dietary fat consumed,
e) the carnivorous diet is a poor exercise performer leaning toward weight gain which is all associated with increased cancer risk,
f) carnivorous high fat eating usually results in a low fiber digestive residue and carcinogenic intestinal conditions.
Going hiking or walking has the advantage of revealing nutrition performance, or confirming what research shows. It's like you can imagine what's on Mars; but you don't know unless you actually live there. The artificial culture can really get neurotic that way. I think it is best to walk the talk, and take the time to live.
When it comes to nutrition you can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink. If he won't drink and the consequences happen, I'm not the one to try profiting off his lack of motivation. If I do that, then all at once I am not living, just profiting instead.
Views: 46
About
© 2024 Created by michael edward badolato jr.
Powered by
